Learning
Your corrections shape how the next draft, review, or update is prepared.
Read about learningYour client’s preferences. The position your firm took last time. The reason behind a change. Useful context carries forward, so every assignment doesn’t start from scratch.
A draft makes more sense when the person writing it knows the background. Your secondee brings relevant client instructions, matter documents, and earlier decisions into the work you assign.
A new agreement is reviewed against the client’s agreed positions, alongside the instructions for this matter.
Your precedents, playbooks, and corrections give the team a starting point. Secondees can draw on that knowledge instead of asking you to repeat the same drafting preferences each time.
Cornelia starts from your preferred wording and flags where the other side’s draft takes a different position.
Useful memory includes where an instruction came from and how it changed. Sources and version history help you trace the basis for a recommendation and review it when the circumstances move on.
A proposed revision comes with the precedent or instruction behind it, so you can check whether it still fits.
“Review this supplier agreement using the positions we agreed for this client.”
Review against the client’s agreed position.
I’ve compared the draft with the client’s agreed positions. The liability wording departs from the earlier instruction; I’ve marked it and included the source for your review.
Relevant context informs the work. You decide whether an earlier position still applies.
Tell us what you’d like to hand off. We’ll help you find a starting point.